Belgium's humane stance on dying kids
Euthanasia remains a practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. Recently, the Belgian Parliament passed a law allowing children with the “capacity for discernment” to request euthanasia. This idea flooded international headlines. By using a comprehensive tone, syntax, and an antithesis, journalist Meghan Daum purposefully discusses how euthanasia has provoked controversial debates regarding the quality of one’s death and ethical views.
Daum’s opening sentence highlights the diverse ethical views of euthanasia. She deems the law a sensitive subject for even the most dramatic TV hospital dramas, and refers to the U.S. as Death-squeamish. In her comparisons to U.S. television shows, she presents an underlying idea that the U.S. possesses fragrant views of life and death. She also points out some U.S. headlines that expose negative views toward Belgium’s new practices. Daum possesses a nonbiased tone throughout the article; however, she admits that 75% of Belgium supports it. This included information implies an understanding of their legislation. She simply leaves the decision in the hands of these Belgian legislators.
In terms of syntax, Daum structures sentences to state a claim then further explain. She frequently uses complex sentences because simple ones will not fluently explain such a controversial topic. She also uses an antithesis to suggest that the right to die remains more about the “abstract potential” than the “actual exercise. The contrasting terms help the readers understand why euthanasia seems necessary to patients anyway.
Daum’s opening sentence highlights the diverse ethical views of euthanasia. She deems the law a sensitive subject for even the most dramatic TV hospital dramas, and refers to the U.S. as Death-squeamish. In her comparisons to U.S. television shows, she presents an underlying idea that the U.S. possesses fragrant views of life and death. She also points out some U.S. headlines that expose negative views toward Belgium’s new practices. Daum possesses a nonbiased tone throughout the article; however, she admits that 75% of Belgium supports it. This included information implies an understanding of their legislation. She simply leaves the decision in the hands of these Belgian legislators.
In terms of syntax, Daum structures sentences to state a claim then further explain. She frequently uses complex sentences because simple ones will not fluently explain such a controversial topic. She also uses an antithesis to suggest that the right to die remains more about the “abstract potential” than the “actual exercise. The contrasting terms help the readers understand why euthanasia seems necessary to patients anyway.